Gov.
"I join all Coloradans who honor and value the dangerous work of firefighters in our communities," Gov. Ritter said at a Capitol news conference this afternoon. "Firefighters have stood with me, and I have stood with them, including yesterday in Montrose when I signed three bills to help volunteer and wildland firefighters; last year when I fought hard to defeat the right-to-work and other harmful ballot initiatives; and in 2007 when I signed legislation, over the strong objection of local government and others, expanding eligibility for workers' compensation coverage for firefighters suffering from cancer."
"As the son of a union member, and a former union member myself in earlier years, I have long believed that collective bargaining can create a positive working relationship for public sector employees and local governments," Gov. Ritter said, citing three main reasons for the veto:
· Local firefighters already may obtain collective bargaining rights through voter approval in their local communities.
· SB 180 would have overturned the will of the voters in communities that have opted against collective bargaining.
· Issues of firefighter safety raised by SB 180 are better addressed on a statewide basis rather than in just the few communities that would have been impacted by the legislation. Therefore, Gov. Ritter has directed the Department of Public Safety to work with the Colorado Professional Firefighters, the Colorado State Fire Chief's Association, the Colorado Municipal League, the Special District Association, Colorado Counties, Inc., and other stakeholders to develop a statewide fire department safety certification program and introduce, if necessary, implementing legislation for the 2010 legislative session.
The Governor was joined at this afternoon's news conference by Greenwood Village Mayor Nancy Sharpe, the chair of the Metro Mayors Caucus; Littleton Mayor Doug Clark; Westminster Mayor Nancy McNally; and Mountain View Fire District Deputy Chief Steve Pischke, all of whom were among the many stakeholders who asked Gov. Ritter to veto this bill.
"The system is not broken," Greenwood Mayor Sharpe said, "and local governments remain committed to the safety of their public safety employees."
"The state should not be telling local voters or local elected representatives what to do when it comes to personnel matters like this," Mayor Clark said.
Deputy Chief Pischke applauded Gov. Ritter for directing the Department of Public Safety to immediately address the issue of firefighter safety.
"SB 180 was overly broad-stroked," Pischke said. "It created difficult problems and did not allow local communities to address local issues."
Here is the complete text of Gov. Ritter's veto message:
June 4, 2009
Honorable
67th General Assembly
First Regular Session
State Capitol
Ladies and Gentlemen,
I am filing with the Secretary of State Senate Bill 09-180, "Concerning collective bargaining by employees of public safety agencies." I vetoed this bill as of 2:39 p.m. today, and this letter sets forth my reasons for doing so.
Senate Bill 09-180 would mandate home-rule municipalities, fire authorities, county improvement districts, and special districts that provide fire protection services to collectively bargain with firefighters in fire departments with fifty or more firefighters. The union would have the authority to act as the exclusive representative of firefighters and to collectively bargain over the terms and conditions of their employment and to address grievances.
I join all Coloradans who honor and value the dangerous work of firefighters in our communities. Firefighters have stood with me, and I have stood with them, including yesterday in Montrose when I signed three bills to help volunteer and wildland firefighters; last year when I fought hard to defeat the right-to-work and other harmful initiatives; and in 2007 when I signed legislation, over the strong objection of local government and others, expanding eligibility for workers compensation coverage for firefighters suffering from cancer.
As the son of a union member, and a union member myself in earlier years, I have long believed that collective bargaining can create a positive working relationship for public sector employees and local governments. But there are other issues I had to consider when deliberating on this bill, issues that led me to the difficult conclusion that a veto of this bill was in the best interests of the people of
First, there is already a process for firefighters to obtain collective bargaining rights—they may ask the voters in the communities that they serve for the opportunity to engage in collective bargaining. This process works and has led to successful collective bargaining agreements for firefighters in many of our communities, including Denver, Aurora, Thornton, Pueblo, Greeley, Longmont, and Englewood.
Second, this bill would overturn the will of the voters in communities that have voted not to give firefighters collective bargaining rights. On several occasions the voters of
Third, the debate on this bill raised important issues about firefighter safety, but there are better ways to address these issues than mandatory collective bargaining in certain communities. We must address firefighter safety at the state level. Doing so ensures that all areas of
While the safety concerns that were highlighted during the course of the debate over Senate Bill 09-180 must be addressed, changing our current system of local voter approval of collective bargaining and overriding the will of the voters who have rejected collective bargaining is not the appropriate solution. Accordingly, I have vetoed this bill.
Sincerely,
Governor
# # #
